100 hairstyles

images trendy hairstyles 2011

best celeb hairstyles. est

samays

11-05 12:20 AM

Hi,
I am travelling to India in November 2009. My visa recently expired and I got my H1b extension until 2012. I work for a big US company of repute. Although my company has no TARP related benefits from the GOV, given the economic conditions, I am little concerned if Stamping in India for visa could be a problem? My concern is if they would deny or delay the visa approval? I have all my documents valid including employment status.My GC is under process(I-140 approved).
Additionally, what precaution should I take that enhances my chances of successful visa stamping?
Please advise.

Thanks in advance.

---

wallpaper best celeb hairstyles. est

with different hairstyles.

Blog Feeds

06-27 02:00 AM

Not surprising, but surprising that Luis would admit it. And if this is the case (and I think it is), then the question is whether we wait until 2011 or later to push again or finally decide it's time to look at other strategies like piecemeal reform (pass DREAM, AgJobs, legal immigration reform now and deal with legalization later) or look at administrative actions like TPS or parole and a moratorium on deportations for people who would otherwise meet the requirements of a proposed legalization program.

More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/gutierrez-not-enough-dems-to-pass-reform-this-year.html)

---

Hairstyle: long, straight

enggr

11-19 01:46 PM

PERM processing date released (as of 10/31/2010).

# Analyst Reviews: September 2010
# Audits: October 2008

My spouse's priority date is late nov 2008 and we are still waiting. Has anyone seen any approvals of audited PERM filed in nov 2008. Please share your experience.
i assume DOL is processing nov as of this month.
Any analysis/predictions?

---

2011 with different hairstyles.

100 top hairstyles

myuserid

01-29 08:36 PM

I am on H4 visa, based in Georgia. Did anyone get �Change of Maiden Name to Married Name� done on passport from Indian Consulate Houston, TX.
Can anyone tell me what am I supposed to write in the �Surname� column in the new online application form ? The old application had 2 columns, 1 for maiden name and the other for Desired Name, but the new online application form has only 1 Surname column. I am confused as to what should I write � my maiden name or my married name. I do have the notarization done on the affidavit form. Does this give me the right to write my married name ? Which name should I sign in the application- maiden or married name?
AlsoI have heard that anybody submitting �Change of Maiden Name to Married Name� application in person, to Indian Consulate Houston, has to collect the new passport at the counter in person, the passport will not be mailed to him/her. The passport is only sent by mail to those who have sent the documents to Indian Consulate Houston by mail.
Is it true?

---

more...

bad ass hairstyles.

iamcutewithu

01-03 02:22 AM

Hi,
I have been working with a company ABC from April 2007 in India. In Oct 2007 I got my H1B visa stamped for a company XYZ of USA and is valid thru OCT 2010. I took a long vacation here in India and went to USA for the company XYZ and stayed there for 45 days. During the period of stay I got my SSN and also I got one payslip generated for two weeks. Becoz of the market slowdown I had to return back to India and joined the same company ABC in India. Now this company ABC wants to process B1 for me, So is there any problem if I have to apply for B1 and is there any problem in the Embassy about the 45 days I spent in US on H1B while I was employed in a company ABC from April 2007?
Please suggest me on this asap

---

When it comes to hairstyles

gsc999

06-21 02:55 PM

When is it safe to change employment once you file for I-485?
thanks!
--
Nitu,

Please see this existing thread below for answer to your question:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5451

The norm is to search the existing threads on IV forum for answer to your questions. Opening new thread with redundant queries tends to dilute other more important issues being discussed.

In future, kindly search the forum before you start a new thread.
Thanks in advance.

---

more...

-hairstyles.org/pics/100b.

aadimanav

10-11 10:46 PM

* bump *:confused:

---

2010 Hairstyle: long, straight

trendy hairstyles 2011

varesident

06-29 11:56 PM

I changed my employer 3 months back and didn't expect the dates to get current so soon. My labor with the new employer has just been filed. However, my previous employer told me that if I want to continue with my gc process with them, I need to be their employee again.
Does it make sense for me to do this ? My 485 will not get filed until 10 days from now because I have yet to start with the paperwork.
Will the dates retrogress by then? Please advise me folks.

---

more...

100 Hairstyles: Hair-athon

Blog Feeds

08-03 12:50 PM

For the past few months, there have been no green cards available for persons in the employment-based third preference category (EB-3) and long backlogs in the EB-2 category for persons born in India and China. So, with few green cards to grant, why has the USCIS been scheduling interviews for persons in these categories? The short answer is that just because the USCIS cannot grant most EB-3 and EB-2 applicants green cards, the agency can take advantage of the lull in applications for adjustment of status to deny persons with pending applications. How can they do that? Easy! Let's say...

More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/how-to-use-your-h-1b-to-qualify-under-section-245k.html)

---

hair 100 top hairstyles

100 Hairstyles: Short Hair Envy pt 2

theOne

04-02 08:55 PM

Can you please respond ? I am trying to plan for travel and change of jobs.

---

more...

Handsome Messy Hairstyle from

vinabath

04-06 12:06 AM

Iinteresting article:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1008366#PaperDownload

---

hot bad ass hairstyles.

headband hairstyles

srikondoji

08-11 08:00 AM

Visa Bulletin for September 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/bulletin/bulletin_5113.html)
This is in sync with what the other site has leaked yesterday.

---

more...

house Celebrity Hairstyles middot; Men

Celebrity hairstyles

kshitijnt

05-05 02:42 PM

I have 3yrs degree(Microbiology) and one year postgraduation diploma in computer science and 9years of work experience, Can I apply on EB2, some peolple saying at I-140 stage it gets problemetic with your degree, my employer says you can eligible to apply on EB2, Iam in real dilama, can any one please help me... thanks

I tend to think that your I140 in EB2 will be a problem. Specially so if your filing center is Nebraska. They have a reputation to be very very strict. Ask your employer if he has previously approved cases for people with your background.

---

tattoo When it comes to hairstyles

Elegant Braided Hairstyles

wc_user

11-15 10:53 PM

My Title is different in H1-B and GC, though it is in the same field.. I am going for stamping to Chennai in January.. Will this be a problem ? Will they ask questions about I-485 filing in H1-B stamping ?

---

more...

pictures -hairstyles.org/pics/100b.

images prom hairstyles for

sambhajisgayake

01-09 07:24 PM

If anybody can mail me the procedure at sambhajisgayake@yahoo.co.in, i will highly your help.

---

dresses headband hairstyles

Celebrity Hairstyles Lookbook

sunny1000

06-04 06:04 PM

This is my third EAD renewal. My 485 is pending at NSC. I am in CA. All my previous EADs/APs etc were filed at NSC.

This time when my EAD renewal is filed (by my new attorney, in new company) I got receipt Number starting with MSC.

Who decides where to file MSC? What's the criteria to file at MSC? Shouldn't it be file at NSC?

Is this a mistake?

No it is not. It is the National Benefits Center receipt number. Mine got transferred from the TSC.

---

more...

makeup 100 Hairstyles: Hair-athon

Celebrity Hairstyles middot; Men

vxg

10-12 02:58 PM

Why is this thread not showing in most recent threads on main page? something wrong with the website?

---

girlfriend Elegant Braided Hairstyles

tattoo medium hairstyles with

sameerguptha

08-06 10:37 PM

OPT Start Date: Jan 2009
OPT End Date: May 2011

Comp A (A Consulting Firm)applied for H1-B in April 2009 thru consular Processing and got approved. I worked for Client X in the month of April but lost my job in a week itself.(thus I dont have any pay Stubs from Comp A)Since Comp A was not able to find me a job. I found A full time job in Comp B in June 2009 , I somehow convinced Comp B to hire me as a contractor as I already have my H1-B approved thru Comp A. Thus from july 2010 I started working for Comp A again as my employer and Comp B as its Client. I am planning to go for VISA stamping in Dec 2010. My Question is

1) If they Ask for my Tax Returns and W2 for 2009 what should I answer as I just have my W2 frm Comp B

2) would there be a question of something like why havent I've been working for Comp A Since my H1 approval.

Please advice. I appreciate any kind of answer

---

hairstyles Handsome Messy Hairstyle from

angelina jolie hairstyle pics

thamarai

09-25 06:52 PM

I am in L2 visa right now and I have an EAD to work. I got a job that I need to start on oct 01.

My spouse status will change from L1 to H1B from oct 01, as his employer filled for H1B.

Our L1 & L2 are valid until Aug 2011.

I don't have H4 yet.

What are the various options available for me to work?

1. Can I use my EAD to work which is valid until aug 2011?

2. Can I apply for H1B for me? If yes when I can start working with my H1B.

3. Is there is any way to maintain my husband L1 status until it's validity(Aug 2011) and then switching to H1B after L1 expires?

---

zoozee

04-17 10:27 PM

Has anybody directly received any communication from BEC regarding the pending LC application? I just received one and am not sure if that is the norm?

Regards

---

Macaca

06-22 06:55 AM

Senate Passes Energy Bill (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/21/AR2007062101026.html?hpid=topnews) Democrats Prevail; Mileage Standard Would Be Raised By Sholnn Freeman (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/sholnn+freeman/) Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, June 22, 2007

The Senate passed a sweeping energy legislation package last night that would mandate the first substantial change in the nation's vehicle fuel-efficiency law since 1975 despite opposition from auto companies and their Senate supporters.

After three days of intense debate and complex maneuvering, Democratic leaders won passage of the bill shortly before midnight by a 65 to 27 vote.

The package, which still must pass the House, would also require that the use of biofuels climb to 36 billion gallons by 2022, would set penalties for gasoline price-gouging and would give the government new powers to investigate oil companies' pricing. It would provide federal grants and loan guarantees to promote research into fuel-efficient vehicles and would support test projects to capture carbon dioxide from coal-burning power plants to be stored underground.

Democratic leaders said they hoped the legislation will be a rallying point for voters concerned about national security, climate change and near-record gasoline prices.

"This bill starts America on a path toward reducing our reliance on oil by increasing the nation's use of renewable fuels and for the first time in decades significantly improving the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks," said Sen. Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.), the majority leader.

Final passage of the bill capped an otherwise rancorous week in which senators grappled over energy policy. Early yesterday, Democrats accused Republicans of obstruction after a $32 billion package of energy tax cuts was blocked on a procedural vote. But late in the day, a bipartisan group of senators came together to break an impasse on vehicle fuel-efficiency standards that would require cars, trucks and sport-utility vehicle to achieve 35 miles per gallon by 2020.

Earlier in the week, the Senate rejected additions to the bill that would have pumped billions of federal dollars into efforts to ramp up production of a coal-based fuel for cars and trucks, which proponents had called an important alternative to petroleum. Additionally, Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.) failed to win approval for a proposal to allow exploration for natural gas off the Virginia coast, and Republicans blocked an effort to require that more of the nation's electricity come for renewable sources.

The passage of fuel-efficiency measure was viewed as a major triumph for the Democrats, particularly the last-minute dealmaking that enabled passage of the comprehensive change to mileage standards.

The politics of fuel economy had gone virtually unchanged since Congress passed the first nationwide standards -- known as corporate average fuel economy, or CAFE -- in 1975. The last time the full Senate tried to boost fuel-economy standards was in 2002, and the effort was defeated handily.

The auto industry successfully argued that large increases in efficiency standards would force them to build smaller vehicles -- the kind American consumers won't buy. In recent years, however, low mileage standards left U.S. automakers with little market defense against higher-mileage Japanese cars, particularly at times when gas prices soar. As consumers have moved gradually from SUVs and pickup trucks to smaller vehicles, Detroit's Big Three automakers have gone through a painful restructuring period.

The United States, with current efficiency standards of 27.5 miles per gallon for cars and 22.2 per gallon for SUVs and small trucks, has lagged behind the rest of the developed world. In the European Union, automakers have agreed to voluntary increases in fuel-economy standards that next year will lift the average to 44.2 miles per gallon, according to the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. In Japan, average vehicle fuel economy tops 45 miles per gallon. China's level is in the mid-30s and projected to rise, propelled by government policy.

The fuel-efficiency language in the Senate energy package originally had coupled a 35 mile-per-gallon standard with a requirement of 4 percent annual increases for the decade after 2020. A group led by the two Michigan senators -- Democrats Carl M. Levin and Debbie Stabenow -- and Sen. Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo.) had sought instead to gain support for an amendment that would impose less-stringent standards while satisfying growing demands for change in the fuel-efficiency laws.

In the compromise-- shepherded principally by Sens. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) -- lawmakers dropped a provision that would have mandated additional 4 percent annual increases in fuel efficiency between 2021 and 2030. They also softened a provision that would have required all automakers to build substantially more vehicles that can run on ethanol and other biofuels.

After the fuel-economy vote, Sen. Byron L. Dorgan (D-N.D.), another architect of the compromise, said the nation's desire to be less dependent on foreign oil would be a "hopeless journey" without more efficient cars and trucks.

"Now, in our vehicles, we have better cup-holders, we have keyless entry, we have better music systems, we have heated seats," Dorgan said. "It is time that we expect more automobile efficiency."

Senators who had previously been friendly to the auto industry said they were changing their position after growing weary of the industry's position. "I listened and I listened, year after year," Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.) said on the Senate floor. "And now, after 20 years, I firmly do believe it is time for a change."

In the end, Senate aides said, Levin's group did not have the votes.

Democratic leaders said the bipartisan backing of the compromise worked out in the Senate would help build support in the House when that chamber House begins debate on its energy package. Already, Rep. John D. Dingell, (D-Mich.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) have battled over fuel economy.

In another Senate battle yesterday, Democrats lost a fight against oil companies when Republicans blocked a $32 billion tax package that would have poured money into alternative fuel projects by raising taxes on oil and gas companies.

President Bush, meanwhile, visited the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant in Athens, Ala., where he touted nuclear power as a clean, dependable and safe source of electricity and promised to streamline the federal regulatory process to ease the way for the construction of new plants.

"Nuclear energy produces no greenhouse gases," Bush said. "If you're interested in cleaning up the air you ought to be for nuclear power."

Staff writer Michael A. Fletcher in Athens, Ala., contributed to this report.

---